某有名HPからの情報で以下の論文をDL。

  • Ebba Gullberg and Sten Lindstrom  “Semantics and the Justification of Deductive Inference”, in: T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson and D. Egonsson, ed., Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, 2007

Is it possible to give a justification of our own practice of deductive inference? The purpose of this paper is to explain what such a justification might consist in and what its purpose could be. …

  • Victoria Höög  “The Philosophers on the Market Square. Philosophical Modernism from Vienna to Uppsala”, in: T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson and D. Egonsson, ed., Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, 2007


Here I will tell a modern story about a shift in philosophical ethos that occurred during the middle of the twentieth century. The shift in scientific ethos was common for several academic disciplines, but the philosophers are in the front in the universities to articulate the shift. My thesis is simple; the European modernist beliefs and the scientific ethos shared cultural meaning that encouraged the university academic to be public intellectual the first part of the twentieth century. The post war period involved a change in scientific ethos.
In Sweden and US philosophy became an intern occupation emphasizing scientific professionalism. If the philosophical room earlier was populated by a motley assembly of academics, some with preference for intricate special field, others with a more public orientation; from the 1960s and onwards the space was dominated by a more homogenized variety of homus philosophicus. The story can be epitomized in a single phrase: From the market square to the ivory tower.

  • David Makinson  “Completeness Theorems, Representation Theorems: What's the Difference?”, in: T. Rønnow-Rasmussen, B. Petersson, J. Josefsson and D. Egonsson, ed., Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, 2007

Most areas of logic can be approached either semantically or syntactically. Typically, the approaches are linked through a completeness or representation theorem. The two kinds of theorem serve a similar purpose, yet there also seems to be some residual distinction between them. In what respects do they differ, and how important are the differences? Can we have one without the other? We discuss these questions, with examples from a variety of different logical systems.