まず、書籍から。以下を paper で入手。

  • Ray Monk and Anthony Palmer ed.  Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy, Thoemmes Press, 1996

これがまだ新品で手に入るとは思っていなかったので、確保できてうれしく思う。


次に論文。

  • Dustin Tucker  “Intensionality and Paradoxes in Ramsey's ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’,” in: The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 3, no. 1, 2010
  • Dirk Schlimm  “Pasch's Philosophy of Mathematics,” in: The Review of Symbolic Logic, vol. 3, no. 1, 2010
  • Douglas Lackey  “Three Letters to Meinong,” in: Russell, Old Series, no. 9, 1973
  • Wesley C. Salmon  “Note on Russell's Anticipations,” in: Russell, Old Series, no. 17, 1975
  • Kenneth Blackwell  “A Non-Existent Revision of “Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy”,” in: Russell, Old Series, no. 18, 1975
  • Nicholas Griffin  “Russell's “Horrible Travesty” of Meinong,” in: Russell, Old Series, nos. 25-28, 1977
  • Ryota Akiyoshi  “On a Relationship between Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem and Hilbert's Program,” in: Annals of the Japan Association for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009

Salmon さんのとても短い文献では、次のような指摘がなされている。

Although Russell did not, strictly speaking, anticipate Nelson Goodman's famous "grue-bleen paradox", first published in a brief note in 1946, Russell did, I believe, publish a discussion of what is, in all essentials, the same problem in Human Knowledge in 1948.
[…]
What is quite remarkable, however, is that Russell, in contrast to Goodman, also provided a resolution of the problem -- one which I believe to be quite satisfactory*1.

*1:Salmon, p. 29.