■

昨晩は例によって途中で寝てしまう。朝まで眠り込んでしまったわけではないのでよかったが…。今日も週末で少々頭痛がする。とりあえず入手文献を以下に記し、コメントは後ほどにする予定。

• D.E. Rowe　　“Klein, Hilbert, and the Göttingen mathematical tradition”　in: Osiris, 2nd ser., vol. 5, 1989
• Ignacio Jané　　“What is Tarski’s common concept of consequence?”,　in: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 12, issue 01, 2006
• Bernard Linsky and Edward N. Zalta　　“What is neologicism?”,　in: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 12, issue 01, 2006
• Risto Vilkko　　“Review of V. Peckhaus (editor), Oskar Becker und die Philosophie der Mathematik”,　in: The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 12, issue 01, 2006
• Earl Conee and Theodore Sider　　Riddles of Existence: A Guided Tour of Metaphysics,　Clarendon Press, 2005

Description

The questions of metaphysics are among the deepest and most puzzling. What is time? Am I free in my actions? What makes me the same person I was as a child? Why is there something rather than nothing? Riddles of Existence makes metaphysics genuinely accessible, even fun. Its lively, informal style brings the riddles to life and shows how stimulating they can be to think about. No philosophical background is required to enjoy this book: anyone wanting to think about life's most profound questions will find Riddles of Existence provocative and entertaining.

PS. コメントを今日付す予定だったが、疲れているので無理である。また明日以降にしよう。おやすみなさい。